Skip to main content
Get your Wikispaces Classroom now:
the easiest way to manage your class.
Pages and Files
Aims and Objectives
Economic Performance Visualizations
Venezuela under Chavez
Elections in Nondemocratic Regimes
The Economic Performance of Dictatorships
Dictatorship and Culture
Dictatorship and Disaster
Dictatorship and Knowledge
The Selectorate Theory
Economic Explanations of Regime Change
Sanctions and Democratization
Violence and Revolution
The Spread of Revolution
Protest and Informational Cascades
The Revolutions of 1989
Student Projects from previous years
The Nazi regime under Hitler
Chile under Pinochet
Non-democracy in film and literature
Dictatorship and Knowledge
Democracy, Dictatorship, and Knowledge
Start writing your answer after the instructions. Note you can use headers to organize your answer, and do not be afraid to edit other people's writing. This is a wiki! Also, you can use the Discussion page to hash out disagreements.
Does democracy mean government by the ignorant? Is there some type of non-democracy that would systematically produce better policy by empowering knowledgeable experts? Would the costs of such a form of government outweigh its benefits?
The point of this page is not to compare democracy with dictatorship in general, but to examine whether there are alternatives to democracy that provide better performance in most or all respects than democracy by restricting political power to some subset of (especially) educated rulers or citizens, or by taking certain matters away from political control and putting them under market management, for example.
Summarize the arguments against democracy from the point of view of knowledge. Are voters well informed? Are voters likely to hit upon the correct policy? Do voters even have reason to be well informed? Does their lack of information matter, if they are not well informed? (Consider also whether any flaws of democracy are inherent, or merely temporary or accidental).
Consider whether there are alternatives that would guarantee superior performance. Would restricting the franchise on the basis of education produce better results, as Mill, for example, claims? Or would taking some policies away from political control and placing them under the control of markets, for example, produce better results (as in, e.g., Robin Hanson's "
Even if you argue that some forms of non-democracy would be likely to produce better results than democracy, you need to consider whether its costs would outweigh its potential gains. Would democracy be justified even if it did not produce the best results? Or maybe alternatives would not be stable - people might resent their exclusion. Etc.
Some of the articles and books in our bibliography
might be useful.
Start writing here - do not delete the instructions. Note you can use headers to organize your answer, and do not be afraid to edit other people's writing. This is a wiki! Also, you can use the Discussion page to hash out disagreements.
help on how to format text
Turn off "Getting Started"